THE LONGEST NIGHT |
CONTENTS |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
![]() | INTRODUCTION |
![]() | CAST AND CHRONOLOGY |
![]() | 1. IN THE HEAT OF THE BATTLE |
• | 1. EQUAL PROTECTION FOR VOTES |
![]() | 2. LAW AND DATA: THE BUTTERFLY BALLOT EPISODE |
![]() | 2. THE MACHINERY OF DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA |
![]() | 3. DISPUTING ELECTIONS |
![]() | 3. THE DECISIONS |
![]() | 4. A BADLY FLAWED ELECTION |
![]() | 5. EXCHANGE BETWEEN RONALD DWORKIN AND CHARLES FRIED |
![]() | 6. BUSH V. GORE: THREE STRIKES FOR THE CONSTITUTION, THE COURT, AND DEMOCRACY, BUT THERE IS ALWAYS NEXT SEASON |
![]() | 7. THE UNBEARABLE RIGHTNESS OF BUSH V. GORE |
![]() | 8. THE GHOSTWRITERS |
• | 9. NOTES FOR THE UNPUBLISHED SUPPLEMENTAL SEPARATE OPINIONS IN BUSH V. GORE |
![]() | 4. AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES |
• | 10. ANATOMY OF A CONSTITUTIONAL COUP |
![]() | 11. THE MANY FACES OF BUSH V. GORE |
• | 12. SPRINGTIME FOR ROUSSEAU |
![]() | 13. MACHIAVELLI IN ROBES? THE COURT IN THE ELECTION |
![]() | 5. FOREIGN PERSPECTIVES |
![]() | 14. A FLAWED YET RESILIENT SYSTEM: A VIEW FROM JERUSALEM |
![]() | 15. CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL REVIEW OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN FRANCE AND A FRENCH JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE ON BUSH V. GORE |
![]() | 16. SEVEN REASONS WHY BUSH V. GORE WOULD HAVE BEEN UNLIKELY IN GERMANY |
![]() | 17. BUSH V. GORE: A VIEW FROM ITALY |
![]() | 18. DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA: A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE MILLENNIAL ELECTION |
![]() | 6. REFORM? |
![]() | 19. WEIGHING THE ALTERNATIVES: REFORM OR DEFORM? |
![]() | 20. THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE: A FATALLY FLAWED INSTITUTION |
![]() | 21. THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE: A MODEST CONTRIBUTION |
![]() | 22. POPULAR ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT WITHOUT A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT |
CONTRIBUTORS |
INDEX |