Notes
2. Pierce JP, Evans N, Farkas AJ, Cavin SW, Berry C, Kramer M, Kealey S, Rosbrook B, Choi W, Kaplan RM. Tobacco use in California: An evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1993. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego, 1994.
3. Patten C, Pierce J, Cavin S, Berry C, Kaplan R. “Progress in protecting non-smokers from environmental tobacco smoke in California workplaces” . Tobacco Control 1995;4:139-144.
4. Tobacco Control Section, California Department of Health Services. Are Californians protected from environmental tobacco smoke? A summary of findings on worksite and household policies: California Adult Tobacco Survey. Sacramento, 1995 September.
5. Tobacco Control Section, California Department of Health Services. Is smoking prohibited in work areas? Sacramento, June 11, 1996.
6. Tobacco Institute, State Activities Division. “California: A multifaceted plan to address the negative environment.” Washington, DC, January 11, 1991. Bates No. 2023012755/2944.
7. Siegel M, Carol J, Jordan J, Hobart R, Schoenmarklin S, DuMelle F, Fisher P. “ Preemption in tobacco control: Review of an emerging public health problem” . JAMA 1997;278(10):858-863.
8. Macdonald HR, Glantz SA. “The political realities of statewide smoking legislation” . Tobacco Control 1997;6:41-54.
9. Kerrigan MJ. “ A proposed comprehensive tobacco control act in California/RIIPP: Memo to Smokeless Tobacco Council, Committee of Counsel. June 28, 1991” .
10. Lucas G. “ Panel defeats no-smoking bill linked to Brown” . San Francisco Chronicle 1991 September 6.
11. Glantz SA, Begay ME. “ Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California” . JAMA 1994;272(15):1176-1182.
14. Lucas G. “ Health groups blast tobacco-industry bill” . San Francisco Chronicle 1991 September 6.
15. Begay ME, Traynor MP, Glantz SA. The twilight of Proposition 99: Reauthorization of tobacco education programs and tobacco industry expenditures in 1993. San Francisco: Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1994 March.
16. Friedman T. “ Labor chairman's bill would ban workplace smoking. Press release, February 13, 1992” .
17. American Cancer Society, American Lung Association, American Heart Association. “ No time like the present. Memo, June 11, 1992” .
21. Kiser D. “ Rationale for support of AB 13 (Friedman) and information on Cal-Stop. Memo to Bob Doyle, Lisa Gaspard. February 16, 1993” .
23. California Restaurant Association. “ Smoking laws: CRA position statements. Sacramento, June 5, 1990” .
29. Du Melle F, Davis A, Ballin S. “Alert on tobacco industry-initiated clean indoor air legislation and/or amendments. Memo to State Executives, State Public Issue Staff, Tobacco-Free America. February 14, 1989” .
32. Abate B, Najera T. “ Clarifying Assembly Bill 13 statewide smoking ban and urging strong support by all affiliates. Memo to Affiliate Presidents, Affiliate Executive Directors, Other Interested Parties. March 1993” .
34. Samuels BE, Begay ME, Hazan AR, Glantz SA. “ Philip Morris's failed experiment in Pittsburgh” . J Health Policy, Politics, and Law 1992;17(2):329-351.
35. Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights. “Position on AB 2667: Neutral. Position statement, June 17, 1992” .
38. Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment. “ Committee analysis: AB 13 (T. Friedman)—As amended: February 22, 1993. March 3, 1993” .
44. Friedman T. “ AB 13, as amended February 22, 1993. Memo to interested parties. March 18, 1993” .
45. Environmental Protection Agency. “Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: Lung cancer and other disorders.” Report No. EPA 600/6-90/006F. Washington, DC, December 1992.
48. Morain D. “ Legislature aims fusillade of bills at tobacco industry” . Los Angeles Times 1993 March 10;A1.
49. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers. “ASHRAE Standard 62-1989: Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality.” Atlanta, GA, 1989.
50. Daynard R. “ What is ASHRAE and why we should care?” Paper presented at a workshop on nonsmokers' rights at the 7th World Conference on Tobacco and Health, Perth, Australia, March 30, 1990 (rev. September 10, 1990). Available from Tobacco Control Resources Center, Northeastern University, Boston.
51. Forster JL, Hourigan ME, Kelder S. “ Locking devices on cigarette vending machines: Evaluation of a city ordinance” . Am J Pub Health 1992;82(9):1217-1219.
52. Kotz K, Forster J, Kloehn D. “An evaluation of the Minnesota state law to restrict youth access to tobacco. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, San Francisco, 1993” .
53. Miller J. “ Staff analysis of Assembly Bill 996 (Tucker) as amended May 4, 1993. August 4, 1993” .
58. McCormick E. “ Tobacco money tied to smoke bill vote” . San Francisco Examiner 1993 June 4;A21-A24.
61. Benson L. “ Attached economic impact study and subsequent print and electronic press coverage re: Proposed 100% smoking ban. Memo to members of the California Senate. June 16, 1993” .
63. Price Waterhouse. “Potential economic effects of a smoking ban in the state of California.” N.p., 1993 May.
66. Morain D. “ Assembly OK's tough anti-smoking bill it rejected earlier” . Los Angeles Times 1993 June 8;A3,A27.
68. Laufer D. “ E-mail to Tina Walls re: San Fran. and CA. November 1, 1993” . Bates No. 2045891104.
70. Brady DE. “ Battle over smoking is heating up” . Los Angeles Times 1993 July 23, Valley edition.
71. Scott S. “ Is Terry Friedman giving away too much?” California Journal Weekly 1993 September 6;3.
72. Merlo E. “ E-mail to David Laufer re: San Fran. and CA. November 2, 1993” . Bates No. 2045891103C.
73. Merlo E. “ Memorandum to Geoff Bible. January 12, 1994” . Bates No. 2022839335.
74. Charlton Research Company. “Philip Morris California statewide.” San Francisco, November 10, 1993. Bates No. 2023324575/4669.
75. Hyde T. “ Memo to Tom Griscom and Roger Mozingo re: California proposal. January 17, 1994” . Bates No. 51256 8081.
76. Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions. “ California Uniform Tobacco Control Act xt of proposed initiative]. 1994” .
77. Woodruff T, Rosbrook B, Pierce J, Glantz S. “Lower levels of cigarette consumption found in smoke-free workplaces in California” . Archives of Internal Medicine 1993(153):1485-1493.
78. Stillman F, Becker D, Swank R, Hantula D, Moses H, Glantz S, Waranch H. “Ending smoking at the Johns Hopkins medical institutions: An evaluation of smoking prevalence and indoor air pollution” . JAMA 1990;264:1565-1569.
79. Patten CA, Gilpin E, Cavin S, Pierce JP. “Workplace smoking policy and changes in smoking behavior in California: A suggested association” . Tobacco Control 1995;4:36-41.
80. Macdonald HR, Glantz SA. Analysis of the smoking and tobacco products, statewide regulation initiative statute. San Francisco: Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1994 March.
90. Attorney General. “ Title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure. Sacramento, March 9, 1994” .
93. Weintraub DM, Ingram C. “Final budget bills stall as Senate tries to alter measure” . Los Angeles Times 1993 June 29.
97. American Lung Association. “ Oppose AB 13 (T. Friedman)—Workplace smoking. Memo, March 23, 1994” .
101. Friedman T. “ Statement of Assemblyman Terry Friedman on Senate attack on anti-smoking legislation” . Press release, March 23, 1994.
103. Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions. “ Petition Response Express Pak. Voter mailer. Sacramento, 1994” .
104. Hemmila D. “ Tobacco firm turns the ballot against foes of smoking” . Contra Costa Times 1994 May 17.
105. Coalition for a Healthy California. “ Secretary of state in L.A. to inform voters of misrepresentation in tobacco industry petition drive” . Press release, April 20, 1994.
108. Sixth Appellate Court, State of California. “City of San Jose v. Department of Health Services et al.” H016744 (Santa Clara County Superior Court No. CV752231). August 18, 1998.
110. Van Lohuizen J. “ Memo to Bob McAdam re: California results. July 29, 1994” . Bates No. ATX05 0048753/8754.
111. Mozingo R, Hyde T. “Memorandum to Tom Griscom and B. Oglesby re: Initiatives in Colorado, California, Arizona. August 4, 1994” . Bates No. 51253 5293/5295.
114. Roper Organization. “A study of public attitudes towards cigarette smoking and the tobacco industry.” Prepared for the Tobacco Institute. Washington, DC, 1978 May.
115. McAdam B. “ Memorandum to interested parties re: Weekly ballot issue update. September 22, 1994” . Bates No. ATX 040540363/0366.
117. Solis SE. “ Poll finds few voters know about fall initiatives” . San Francisco Chronicle 1994 July 28;A17-A18.
118. Field Institute. “ Majorities favor Prop. 184 (three strikes) but oppose Prop. 186 (single-payer health), opinions of Prop. 188 (smoking) are evenly split” . Press release, September 28, 1994.
119. Feldman P. “ Times Poll: 62 percent would bar services to illegal immigrants” . Los Angeles Times 1994 September 14;A1.
129. Morain D. “ Lungren tries to avoid link of big tobacco” . Los Angeles Times 1998 September 23;A1.
130. Russell S. “ Smoking initiative ad battle heats up” . San Francisco Chronicle 1994 October 21;A4.
132. Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions. “—Yes on Proposition 188. What do people think about smoking laws? Voter contact mail, 1994” .
135. Levy D. “ California smoking initiative has tobacco industry foes fuming” . USA Today 1994 November 4;4D.
139. Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights. “Stations agreeing to use the full name of Proposition 188's sponsor” . Press release, 1994.
140. Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights. “Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights files FCC complaint over Prop 188 ads” . October 25, 1994.
142. Coalition for a Healthy California. “ FCC says broadcasters must disclose tobacco ties to Pro-188 commercials” . Press release, November 1, 1994.