R

R. J. Reynolds

Addiction Research Foundation, 304

additives, 213 , 220 , 222 , 229

advertising claims for Real cigarettes, 218

American Cancer Society, 351 , 385

annual pesticide residue meeting, 209

Chemosol, 213

cocoa, 220

congressional testimony, 173

coumarin in Now and Vantage cigarettes, subsequently removed, 222

Eclipse, 440

Environmental Protection Agency, attacks on, 181

G-13 process, 217

Garfinkle, Lawrence, 351 , 385

nicotine delivery devices compared to Ariel, 76 -77

Now cigarettes contained coumarin, subsequently removed, 222

passive smoking and lung cancer, 351 , 385 , 415

Premier, 30 , 77 , 219 , 440

Projects A and B, 193 -197

Proposition 5, 420 , 421

smoke from cigarettes, 154

Sullum, Jacob, 181

Tobacco Industry Research Committee, 33

tobacco substitutes, 164

Tobacco Working Group, 155

Vantage cigarettes contained coumarin, subsequently removed, 222

Washington University site visit, 311

Winchester little cigar, 259

workplace smoking, restrictions on, 251

radiation, Council for Tobacco Research special project, 333

Raleigh cigarettes

billboard in First Blood,371

brand advertising to communicate health and political information, 191

coumarin, 222

Rambo, 367

Reader's Digest

early studies on smoking and cancer, 25

filter cigarettes, relative toxicity of, 30

Reader's Digest (continued)

public relations problems created for industry, 122

Royal College of Physicians report, 47

Real cigarettes

advertising claims, 218

menthol, 154 , 218

Reason Foundation, receipt of funds from Philip Morris, 181

reconstituted tobacco

biological activity, 130 , 131 , 145

carbon monoxide, reduction by use of, 130

enriched in Ariel cigarettes, 75 -76

high-nicotine content, 85

processed cigarette leaf, 130

red light tests

antitrust issues, 285

avoidance of, 302

carcinogenicity, 288

reduced biological activity. See "Safe" cigarette; Rio, Project

Regional Governors' Associations, Tobacco Institute support, 386

regulation

additives, 202 , 233

advertising restrictions, coping with, 408

common-sense opposition, 195

DDT, tobacco as exempt from limits on, 210

fear of, by industry, 247 , 248

federal level preferred, 259

industry research on carcinogenicity of cigarettes, 123

jurisdiction divided, 256 -257

legal challenges, 259 -263

nicotine addiction, implications of, 102

nitrosamines, 399

pesticides, 209 , 210

preemptions, as industry strategy, 259

product placement in films to circumvent broadcast ad ban, 368 -369

Robertson, Gray (Healthy Buildings International), testimony of, 412

secondhand smoke, 257 -258

smoker compensation, implications, 89 , 91

smoking machines, 91

special account 5, 329

strategies by industry to avoid, 90 , 253 -259

sucker control agents, Department of Agriculture limited authority over, 203

tar derby, benefit to industry of ending, 27 -28

tobacco substitutes, implication of, 162

West Germany and pesticides, 209

workplace smoking, 250 -251

See also Food and Drug Administration; Occupational Health and Safety Administration; Politics; Proposition 5

research, scientific. See Scientific research

research conferences

attendees, 279

Brazil (1983), 219 -220

Chelwood (1972), 135 -136

Duck Key (1974), 136 -137, 164 , 395

eugenol, 219 -220

London (1979), 140 -141

Merano (1975), 137 -139, 395 -396

Montebello (1982), 142 -143

Pichlarn (1981), 141 -142, 211 , 401

Rio De Janeiro (1983), 406

schedule, 282

Sea Island (1980), 166 -167, 400

Smoking Behavior Marketing Conference, Montreal (1984), 374 -376

Southampton (1984), 407

St. Adele (1970), 135

Sydney (1978), 138 -139, 398 -399

See also by specific research conference

reserpine

compared to nicotine, 62

Hippo II, Project, 63 -64

Response Analysis Corporation

environmental tobacco smoke, 311 -312

special account 4 research project, 334

Rhinestone Cowboy,367

Rio, Project

Ames test, 148 -149

design of cigarettes with reduced biological activity, 146 -151

general goals, 146

legal dangers, 146 , 265 -266

Rio de Janeiro Research Conference (1983)

nicotine, 94 -95

sharing of information among BAT affiliates and subsidiaries, 278 -281

sidestream smoke, 406 -407

smoker compensation, 88 -89

Rocky IV, 366 , 367

rodenticides, residues in tobacco, 202

Roper Organization, polls conducted for industry, 392 -393

Royal College of Physicians report

debate over industry response to, 26

industry response to, III, 40

public attention, 47

Scientific American,47

summary of, 46 -47

tobacco industry reaction to, 47

Tobacco Manufacture Standing Committee, attack on, 186

YouMaySmoke attacks, 174

Rylander symposium, 309